Enthalpy (H H H ): The heat content of a system at constant pressure. It is a state function.
Enthalpy change (Δ H \Delta H Δ H ): The heat exchanged with the surroundings during a process at Constant pressure.
Δ H = H p r o d u c t s − H r e a c t a n t s \Delta H = H_{\mathrm{products}} - H_{\mathrm{reactants}} Δ H = H products − H reactants
Exothermic: Δ H < 0 \Delta H \lt 0 Δ H < 0 . Heat is released to the surroundings. The products have less Enthalpy than the reactants.
Examples: combustion, neutralisation, respiration.
Endothermic: Δ H > 0 \Delta H \gt 0 Δ H > 0 . Heat is absorbed from the surroundings. The products have more Enthalpy than the reactants.
Examples: thermal decomposition, photosynthesis, dissolving N H 4 N O 3 \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{NO}_3 NH 4 NO 3 in water.
Standard enthalpy changes are measured under standard conditions:
Pressure: 1 a t m 1 \mathrm{ atm} 1 atm (101.3 k P a 101.3 \mathrm{ kPa} 101.3 kPa ) Concentration: 1 m o l / d m 3 1 \mathrm{ mol/dm}^3 1 mol/dm 3 for solutions Temperature: 25 ∘ C 25^\circ\mathrm{C} 2 5 ∘ C (298 K 298 \mathrm{ K} 298 K ) All substances in their standard states The standard state is the pure substance at 1 atm and the specified temperature.
The enthalpy change when 1 mole of a compound is formed from its elements in their standard states Under standard conditions.
C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → C O 2 ( g ) Δ H f ∘ = − 393.5 k J / m o l \mathrm{C}_{(s)} + \mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} \quad \Delta H_f^\circ = -393.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) Δ H f ∘ = − 393.5 kJ/mol
By definition, Δ H f ∘ \Delta H_f^\circ Δ H f ∘ of any element in its standard state = 0.
Δ H f ∘ ( C ( s , g r a p h i t e ) ) = 0 ; Δ H f ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = 0 \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{(s,\mathrm{ graphite})}) = 0 \quad ; \quad \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{H}_{2(g)}) = 0 Δ H f ∘ ( C ( s , graphite ) ) = 0 ; Δ H f ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = 0
Caution: Warning Involves formation FROM elements, not the other way around.
The enthalpy change when 1 mole of a substance is completely burned in excess oxygen under standard Conditions.
C H 4 ( g ) + 2 O 2 ( g ) → C O 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H c ∘ = − 890.3 k J / m o l \mathrm{CH}_{4(g)} + 2\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} + 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} \quad \Delta H_c^\circ = -890.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} CH 4 ( g ) + 2 O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H c ∘ = − 890.3 kJ/mol
Combustion is always exothermic, so Δ H c ∘ < 0 \Delta H_c^\circ \lt 0 Δ H c ∘ < 0 .
The enthalpy change when 1 mole of water is formed from the reaction between an acid and an alkali Under standard conditions.
H ( a q ) + + O H ( a q ) − → H 2 O ( l ) Δ H n e u t ∘ = − 57.3 k J / m o l \mathrm{H}^+_{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-_{(aq)} \to \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} \quad \Delta H_{\mathrm{neut}}^\circ = -57.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} H ( a q ) + + OH ( a q ) − → H 2 O ( l ) Δ H neut ∘ = − 57.3 kJ/mol
For strong acid-strong base reactions, Δ H n e u t ∘ \Delta H_{\mathrm{neut}}^\circ Δ H neut ∘ is approximately constant at − 57.3 k J / m o l -57.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 57.3 kJ/mol because the net ionic equation is always the same.
For weak acid-strong base reactions, Δ H n e u t ∘ \Delta H_{\mathrm{neut}}^\circ Δ H neut ∘ is less exothermic (less Negative) because energy is absorbed to dissociate the weak acid.
The enthalpy change to form 1 mole of gaseous atoms from the element in its standard state.
1 2 C l 2 ( g ) → C l ( g ) Δ H a t ∘ = + 122 k J / m o l \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Cl}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{Cl}_{(g)} \quad \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ = +122 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 2 1 Cl 2 ( g ) → Cl ( g ) Δ H at ∘ = + 122 kJ/mol
This is always endothermic (bonds must be broken).
Substance Δ H f ∘ \Delta H_f^\circ Δ H f ∘ (kJ/mol)Δ H c ∘ \Delta H_c^\circ Δ H c ∘ (kJ/mol)C O 2 ( g ) \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} CO 2 ( g ) − 393.5 -393.5 − 393.5 — H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} H 2 O ( l ) − 285.8 -285.8 − 285.8 — H 2 O ( g ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(g)} H 2 O ( g ) − 241.8 -241.8 − 241.8 — C H 4 ( g ) \mathrm{CH}_{4(g)} CH 4 ( g ) − 74.8 -74.8 − 74.8 − 890.3 -890.3 − 890.3 C 2 H 5 O H ( l ) \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_{5}\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} C 2 H 5 OH ( l ) − 277.7 -277.7 − 277.7 − 1367 -1367 − 1367 C 3 H 8 ( g ) \mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)} C 3 H 8 ( g ) − 103.8 -103.8 − 103.8 − 2220 -2220 − 2220 N H 3 ( g ) \mathrm{NH}_{3(g)} NH 3 ( g ) − 46.0 -46.0 − 46.0 − 383 -383 − 383 N a O H ( a q ) \mathrm{NaOH}_{(aq)} NaOH ( a q ) − 470.1 -470.1 − 470.1 —
Hess’s Law states that the enthalpy change for a reaction is the same regardless of the route taken From reactants to products, provided the initial and final conditions are the same.
This is a consequence of enthalpy being a state function .
Using Enthalpies of Formation:
Δ H r e a c t i o n = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) \Delta H_{\mathrm{reaction}} = \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{products}) - \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) Δ H reaction = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( products ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( reactants )
Using Enthalpies of Combustion:
Δ H r e a c t i o n = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) \Delta H_{\mathrm{reaction}} = \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) - \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{products}) Δ H reaction = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( reactants ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( products )
Note the reversal of signs compared to formation.
Worked example 1: Calculate Δ H \Delta H Δ H for the reaction:
C 3 H 8 ( g ) + 5 O 2 ( g ) → 3 C O 2 ( g ) + 4 H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{C}_{3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)}} + 5\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to 3\mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} + 4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} C 3 H 8 ( g ) + 5 O 2 ( g ) → 3 CO 2 ( g ) + 4 H 2 O ( l )
Given: Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) = − 2220 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)}}) = -2220 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) = − 2220 kJ/mol Δ H c ∘ ( C O 2 ( g ) ) = 0 \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{CO}_{2(g)}) = 0 Δ H c ∘ ( CO 2 ( g ) ) = 0 (it is already fully oxidised), Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 O ( l ) ) = 0 \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)}) = 0 Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 O ( l ) ) = 0 .
Answer Since C O 2 \mathrm{CO}_2 CO 2 and H 2 O \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} H 2 O are already combustion products, their Δ H c ∘ = 0 \Delta H_c^\circ = 0 Δ H c ∘ = 0 .
Δ H = Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ) − [ 3 Δ H c ∘ ( C O 2 ) + 4 Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 O ) ] \Delta H = \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_8) - [3\Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{CO}_2) + 4\Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O})] Δ H = Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ) − [ 3Δ H c ∘ ( CO 2 ) + 4Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 O )] = − 2220 − [ 3 ( 0 ) + 4 ( 0 ) ] = − 2220 k J / m o l = -2220 - [3(0) + 4(0)] = -2220 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} = − 2220 − [ 3 ( 0 ) + 4 ( 0 )] = − 2220 kJ/mol
This makes sense: the enthalpy of combustion of propane equals the enthalpy change of its combustion Reaction.
Worked example 2: Calculate Δ H f ∘ \Delta H_f^\circ Δ H f ∘ of ethanol given:
C 2 H 5 O H ( l ) + 3 O 2 ( g ) → 2 C O 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H = − 1367 k J / m o l \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_{5}\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} + 3\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to 2\mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} \quad \Delta H = -1367 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} C 2 H 5 OH ( l ) + 3 O 2 ( g ) → 2 CO 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H = − 1367 kJ/mol
Δ H f ∘ ( C O 2 ( g ) ) = − 393.5 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{CO}_{2(g)}) = -393.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( CO 2 ( g ) ) = − 393.5 kJ/mol Δ H f ∘ ( H 2 O ( l ) ) = − 285.8 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)}) = -285.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( H 2 O ( l ) ) = − 285.8 kJ/mol
Answer Using Δ H = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) \Delta H = \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{products}) - \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) Δ H = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( products ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( reactants ) :
− 1367 = [ 2 ( − 393.5 ) + 3 ( − 285.8 ) ] − [ Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 O H ) + 3 ( 0 ) ] -1367 = [2(-393.5) + 3(-285.8)] - [\Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH}) + 3(0)] − 1367 = [ 2 ( − 393.5 ) + 3 ( − 285.8 )] − [ Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 OH ) + 3 ( 0 )]
− 1367 = [ − 787.0 + ( − 857.4 ) ] − Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 O H ) -1367 = [-787.0 + (-857.4)] - \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH}) − 1367 = [ − 787.0 + ( − 857.4 )] − Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 OH )
− 1367 = − 1644.4 − Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 O H ) -1367 = -1644.4 - \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH}) − 1367 = − 1644.4 − Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 OH )
Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 O H ) = − 1644.4 + 1367 = − 277.4 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH}) = -1644.4 + 1367 = -277.4 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( C 2 H 5 OH ) = − 1644.4 + 1367 = − 277.4 kJ/mol
This agrees with the accepted value of − 277.7 k J / m o l -277.7 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 277.7 kJ/mol .
Worked example 3: Using enthalpies of combustion, calculate Δ H \Delta H Δ H for:
3 C ( s ) + 4 H 2 ( g ) → C 3 H 8 ( g ) 3\mathrm{C}_{(s)} + 4\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)} 3 C ( s ) + 4 H 2 ( g ) → C 3 H 8 ( g )
Given: Δ H c ∘ ( C ( s ) ) = − 393.5 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{(s)}) = -393.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( C ( s ) ) = − 393.5 kJ/mol (same as Δ H c ∘ ( C O 2 ) \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{CO}_2) Δ H c ∘ ( CO 2 ) since combustion of C gives C O 2 \mathrm{CO}_2 CO 2 ), Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = − 285.8 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{H}_{2(g)}) = -285.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = − 285.8 kJ/mol (gives H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} H 2 O ( l ) ), Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) = − 2220 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)}}) = -2220 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) = − 2220 kJ/mol .
Answer Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) \Delta H = \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) - \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{products}) Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( reactants ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( products )
= [ 3 ( − 393.5 ) + 4 ( − 285.8 ) ] − [ ( − 2220 ) ] = [3(-393.5) + 4(-285.8)] - [(-2220)] = [ 3 ( − 393.5 ) + 4 ( − 285.8 )] − [( − 2220 )]
= [ − 1180.5 + ( − 1143.2 ) ] − ( − 2220 ) = [-1180.5 + (-1143.2)] - (-2220) = [ − 1180.5 + ( − 1143.2 )] − ( − 2220 )
= − 2323.7 + 2220 = − 103.7 k J / m o l = -2323.7 + 2220 = -103.7 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} = − 2323.7 + 2220 = − 103.7 kJ/mol
This is Δ H f ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{3\mathrm{H}_{8(g)}}) Δ H f ∘ ( C 3 H 8 ( g ) ) Matching the reference value of − 103.8 k J / m o l -103.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 103.8 kJ/mol .
The mean bond enthalpy is the average enthalpy change when 1 mole of a specified type of bond is Broken in the gaseous state, averaged over a range of compounds.
Bond breaking is always endothermic (Δ H > 0 \Delta H \gt 0 Δ H > 0 ). Bond forming is always exothermic (Δ H < 0 \Delta H \lt 0 Δ H < 0 ).
Δ H ≈ ∑ ( b o n d s b r o k e n ) − ∑ ( b o n d s f o r m e d ) \Delta H \approx \sum (\mathrm{bonds broken}) - \sum (\mathrm{bonds formed}) Δ H ≈ ∑ ( bondsbroken ) − ∑ ( bondsformed )
Bond Enthalpy (kJ/mol) Bond Enthalpy (kJ/mol) C—C 347 C—H 413 C=C 614 O—H 464 C≡ \equiv ≡ C 839 H—H 436 C—O 358 O=O 498 C=O 805 (in C O 2 \mathrm{CO}_2 CO 2 ) N≡ \equiv ≡ N 945 C=O 743 (in aldehydes/ketones) N—H 391 C—Cl 346 F—F 158 O—O 146 Cl—Cl 243
Caution
Give good estimates. For reactions involving liquids or aqueous solutions, additional energy changes (vaporisation, dissolution) are not accounted for, so the estimate is less accurate.
Worked example 4: Estimate Δ H \Delta H Δ H for the combustion of methane using bond enthalpies.
C H 4 ( g ) + 2 O 2 ( g ) → C O 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( g ) \mathrm{CH}_{4(g)} + 2\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} + 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(g)} CH 4 ( g ) + 2 O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( g )
Answer Bonds broken:
4 × \times × C—H = 4 × 413 = 1652 k J / m o l 4 \times 413 = 1652 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 4 × 413 = 1652 kJ/mol 2 × \times × O=O = 2 × 498 = 996 k J / m o l 2 \times 498 = 996 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 2 × 498 = 996 kJ/mol Total bonds broken = 1652 + 996 = 2648 k J / m o l 1652 + 996 = 2648 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 1652 + 996 = 2648 kJ/mol
Bonds formed:
2 × \times × C=O (in C O 2 \mathrm{CO}_2 CO 2 ) = 2 × 805 = 1610 k J / m o l 2 \times 805 = 1610 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 2 × 805 = 1610 kJ/mol 4 × \times × O—H (in 2 H 2 O 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} 2 H 2 O ) = 4 × 464 = 1856 k J / m o l 4 \times 464 = 1856 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 4 × 464 = 1856 kJ/mol Total bonds formed = 1610 + 1856 = 3466 k J / m o l 1610 + 1856 = 3466 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 1610 + 1856 = 3466 kJ/mol
Δ H = 2648 − 3466 = − 818 k J / m o l \Delta H = 2648 - 3466 = -818 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = 2648 − 3466 = − 818 kJ/mol
Note: the accepted value is − 890.3 k J / m o l -890.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 890.3 kJ/mol (for H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} H 2 O ( l ) ). The Discrepancy arises because bond enthalpies are averages and we used H 2 O ( g ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(g)} H 2 O ( g ) Rather than H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} H 2 O ( l ) .
Worked example 5: Using bond enthalpies, estimate the enthalpy change for:
N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 N H 3 ( g ) \mathrm{N}_{2(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} \to 2\mathrm{NH}_{3(g)} N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 NH 3 ( g )
Answer Bonds broken:
1 × \times × N≡ \equiv ≡ N = 945 k J / m o l 945 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 945 kJ/mol 3 × \times × H—H = 3 × 436 = 1308 k J / m o l 3 \times 436 = 1308 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 3 × 436 = 1308 kJ/mol Total bonds broken = 945 + 1308 = 2253 k J / m o l 945 + 1308 = 2253 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 945 + 1308 = 2253 kJ/mol
Bonds formed:
6 × \times × N—H = 6 × 391 = 2346 k J / m o l 6 \times 391 = 2346 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 6 × 391 = 2346 kJ/mol Δ H = 2253 − 2346 = − 93 k J / m o l \Delta H = 2253 - 2346 = -93 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = 2253 − 2346 = − 93 kJ/mol
For 2 mol N H 3 \mathrm{NH}_3 NH 3 : Δ H = − 93 k J \Delta H = -93 \mathrm{ kJ} Δ H = − 93 kJ So per mole of reaction: − 93 k J / m o l -93 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 93 kJ/mol .
Accepted Δ H f ∘ ( N H 3 ( g ) ) = − 46.0 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{NH}_{3(g)}) = -46.0 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( NH 3 ( g ) ) = − 46.0 kJ/mol So Δ H = 2 × ( − 46.0 ) = − 92.0 k J / m o l \Delta H = 2 \times (-46.0) = -92.0 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = 2 × ( − 46.0 ) = − 92.0 kJ/mol . The estimate is close.
Calorimetry measures the heat exchanged during a reaction by observing the temperature change of a Known mass of water (or solution).
q = m c Δ T q = mc\Delta T q = m c Δ T
Where:
q q q = heat energy (J)m m m = mass of water/solution (g)c c c = specific heat capacity (4.18 J g− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 for water)Δ T \Delta T Δ T = temperature change (K or ∘ ^\circ ∘ C)Δ H = − q n = − m c Δ T n \Delta H = -\frac{q}{n} = -\frac{mc\Delta T}{n} Δ H = − n q = − n m c Δ T
The negative sign converts the perspective: if the solution temperature rises (Δ T > 0 \Delta T \gt 0 Δ T > 0 ), The reaction is exothermic (Δ H < 0 \Delta H \lt 0 Δ H < 0 ).
Used for reactions in solution (e.g., neutralisation, dissolution).
Assumptions:
The density of the solution is 1.00 g/cm3 ^3 3 (so mass in g = volume in cm3 ^3 3 ). The specific heat capacity of the solution is the same as water (4.18 J g− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 ). No heat is lost to the surroundings (or the calorimeter is well insulated). The calorimeter itself absorbs negligible heat. Worked example 6: 50.0 cm3 ^3 3 of 1.00 mol/dm3 ^3 3 HCl is mixed with 50.0 cm3 ^3 3 of 1.00 Mol/dm3 ^3 3 NaOH in a polystyrene cup. The temperature rises from 22.0 ∘ C 22.0^\circ\mathrm{C} 22. 0 ∘ C to 28.8 ∘ C 28.8^\circ\mathrm{C} 28. 8 ∘ C . Calculate Δ H \Delta H Δ H for the neutralisation per mole of water formed.
Answer Total volume = 50.0 + 50.0 = 100.0 c m 3 50.0 + 50.0 = 100.0 \mathrm{ cm}^3 50.0 + 50.0 = 100.0 cm 3
Mass of solution = 100.0 g 100.0 \mathrm{ g} 100.0 g (density = 1.00 g/cm3 ^3 3 )
Δ T = 28.8 − 22.0 = 6.8 ∘ C \Delta T = 28.8 - 22.0 = 6.8^\circ\mathrm{C} Δ T = 28.8 − 22.0 = 6. 8 ∘ C
q = m c Δ T = 100.0 × 4.18 × 6.8 = 2842 J = 2.842 k J q = mc\Delta T = 100.0 \times 4.18 \times 6.8 = 2842 \mathrm{ J} = 2.842 \mathrm{ kJ} q = m c Δ T = 100.0 × 4.18 × 6.8 = 2842 J = 2.842 kJ
Moles of H 2 O \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} H 2 O formed = moles of H C l \mathrm{HCl} HCl = 1.00 × 50.0 / 1000 = 0.0500 m o l 1.00 \times 50.0 / 1000 = 0.0500 \mathrm{ mol} 1.00 × 50.0/1000 = 0.0500 mol
Δ H = − 2.842 0.0500 = − 56.8 k J / m o l \Delta H = -\dfrac{2.842}{0.0500} = -56.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = − 0.0500 2.842 = − 56.8 kJ/mol
This is close to the standard value of − 57.3 k J / m o l -57.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 57.3 kJ/mol .
Used to measure enthalpies of combustion. A known mass of fuel is burned, and the temperature rise Of a known mass of water is measured.
Worked example 7: 1.50 g of ethanol is burned in a spirit burner. The heat produced raises the Temperature of 200 g of water from 20.0 ∘ C 20.0^\circ\mathrm{C} 20. 0 ∘ C to 45.5 ∘ C 45.5^\circ\mathrm{C} 45. 5 ∘ C . Calculate the Enthalpy of combustion of ethanol.
Answer q = m c Δ T = 200 × 4.18 × ( 45.5 − 20.0 ) = 200 × 4.18 × 25.5 = 21318 J = 21.32 k J q = mc\Delta T = 200 \times 4.18 \times (45.5 - 20.0) = 200 \times 4.18 \times 25.5 = 21318 \mathrm{ J} = 21.32 \mathrm{ kJ} q = m c Δ T = 200 × 4.18 × ( 45.5 − 20.0 ) = 200 × 4.18 × 25.5 = 21318 J = 21.32 kJ
Moles of C 2 H 5 O H = 1.50 / 46.1 = 0.0325 m o l \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH} = 1.50 / 46.1 = 0.0325 \mathrm{ mol} C 2 H 5 OH = 1.50/46.1 = 0.0325 mol
Δ H c = − 21.32 0.0325 = − 656 k J / m o l \Delta H_c = -\dfrac{21.32}{0.0325} = -656 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c = − 0.0325 21.32 = − 656 kJ/mol
The accepted value is − 1367 k J / m o l -1367 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 1367 kJ/mol . The experimental value is much less exothermic due To heat losses to the surroundings and incomplete combustion.
Error Effect Minimisation Heat loss to surroundings Δ T \Delta T Δ T too small; Δ H \Delta H Δ H less negativeUse a polystyrene cup (good insulator) Incomplete combustion Less heat released Ensure good air supply Evaporation of fuel during weighing Apparent mass too low Weigh quickly; use a cap Heat absorbed by calorimeter Δ T \Delta T Δ T too smallAccount for calorimeter heat capacity
Born-Haber cycles calculate lattice energies of ionic compounds using Hess’s Law. The lattice energy Is the enthalpy change when 1 mole of an ionic solid is formed from its gaseous ions.
Atomisation of sodium: N a ( s ) → N a ( g ) \mathrm{Na}_{(s)} \to \mathrm{Na}_{(g)} Na ( s ) → Na ( g ) (Δ H a t ∘ = + 108 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ = +108 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ = + 108 kJ/mol )Ionisation of sodium: N a ( g ) → N a ( g ) + + e − \mathrm{Na}_{(g)} \to \mathrm{Na}^+_{(g)} + e^- Na ( g ) → Na ( g ) + + e − (I E 1 = + 496 k J / m o l \mathrm{IE}_1 = +496 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} IE 1 = + 496 kJ/mol )Atomisation of chlorine: 1 2 C l 2 ( g ) → C l ( g ) \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Cl}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{Cl}_{(g)} 2 1 Cl 2 ( g ) → Cl ( g ) (Δ H a t ∘ = + 122 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ = +122 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ = + 122 kJ/mol )Electron affinity of chlorine: C l ( g ) + e − → C l ( g ) − \mathrm{Cl}_{(g)} + e^- \to \mathrm{Cl}^-_{(g)} Cl ( g ) + e − → Cl ( g ) − (E A = − 349 k J / m o l \mathrm{EA} = -349 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} EA = − 349 kJ/mol )Lattice energy: N a ( g ) + + C l ( g ) − → N a C l ( s ) \mathrm{Na}^+_{(g)} + \mathrm{Cl}^-_{(g)} \to \mathrm{NaCl}_{(s)} Na ( g ) + + Cl ( g ) − → NaCl ( s ) (Δ H l a t t = ? \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} = ? Δ H latt = ? )Formation: N a ( s ) + 1 2 C l 2 ( g ) → N a C l ( s ) \mathrm{Na}_{(s)} + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Cl}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{NaCl}_{(s)} Na ( s ) + 2 1 Cl 2 ( g ) → NaCl ( s ) (Δ H f ∘ = − 411 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ = -411 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ = − 411 kJ/mol )By Hess’s Law:
Δ H f ∘ = Δ H a t ( N a ) + I E 1 ( N a ) + Δ H a t ( C l ) + E A ( C l ) + Δ H l a t t \Delta H_f^\circ = \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{Na}) + \mathrm{IE}_1(\mathrm{Na}) + \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{Cl}) + \mathrm{EA}(\mathrm{Cl}) + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} Δ H f ∘ = Δ H at ( Na ) + IE 1 ( Na ) + Δ H at ( Cl ) + EA ( Cl ) + Δ H latt
− 411 = 108 + 496 + 122 + ( − 349 ) + Δ H l a t t -411 = 108 + 496 + 122 + (-349) + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 411 = 108 + 496 + 122 + ( − 349 ) + Δ H latt
− 411 = 377 + Δ H l a t t -411 = 377 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 411 = 377 + Δ H latt
Δ H l a t t = − 411 − 377 = − 788 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} = -411 - 377 = -788 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H latt = − 411 − 377 = − 788 kJ/mol
Worked example 8: Calculate the lattice energy of M g O \mathrm{MgO} MgO given:
Δ H a t ∘ ( M g ) = + 148 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ(\mathrm{Mg}) = +148 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ ( Mg ) = + 148 kJ/mol I E 1 ( M g ) = + 738 k J / m o l \mathrm{IE}_1(\mathrm{Mg}) = +738 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} IE 1 ( Mg ) = + 738 kJ/mol I E 2 ( M g ) = + 1451 k J / m o l \mathrm{IE}_2(\mathrm{Mg}) = +1451 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} IE 2 ( Mg ) = + 1451 kJ/mol Δ H a t ∘ ( O ) = + 248 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ(\mathrm{O}) = +248 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ ( O ) = + 248 kJ/mol (for 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → O ( g ) \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{O}_{(g)} 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → O ( g ) )E A 1 ( O ) = − 141 k J / m o l \mathrm{EA}_1(\mathrm{O}) = -141 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} EA 1 ( O ) = − 141 kJ/mol E A 2 ( O ) = + 798 k J / m o l \mathrm{EA}_2(\mathrm{O}) = +798 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} EA 2 ( O ) = + 798 kJ/mol (second electron affinity is endothermic)Δ H f ∘ ( M g O ) = − 602 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{MgO}) = -602 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( MgO ) = − 602 kJ/mol Answer Δ H f ∘ = Δ H a t ( M g ) + I E 1 + I E 2 + Δ H a t ( O ) + E A 1 + E A 2 + Δ H l a t t \Delta H_f^\circ = \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{Mg}) + \mathrm{IE}_1 + \mathrm{IE}_2 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{O}) + \mathrm{EA}_1 + \mathrm{EA}_2 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} Δ H f ∘ = Δ H at ( Mg ) + IE 1 + IE 2 + Δ H at ( O ) + EA 1 + EA 2 + Δ H latt
− 602 = 148 + 738 + 1451 + 248 + ( − 141 ) + 798 + Δ H l a t t -602 = 148 + 738 + 1451 + 248 + (-141) + 798 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 602 = 148 + 738 + 1451 + 248 + ( − 141 ) + 798 + Δ H latt
− 602 = 3242 + Δ H l a t t -602 = 3242 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 602 = 3242 + Δ H latt
Δ H l a t t = − 602 − 3242 = − 3844 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} = -602 - 3242 = -3844 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H latt = − 602 − 3242 = − 3844 kJ/mol
The large magnitude reflects the high charges on M g 2 + \mathrm{Mg}^{2+} Mg 2 + and O 2 − \mathrm{O}^{2-} O 2 − .
Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of a system.
Δ S = S p r o d u c t s − S r e a c t a n t s \Delta S = S_{\mathrm{products}} - S_{\mathrm{reactants}} Δ S = S products − S reactants
Physical state: Gas > \gt > Liquid > \gt > Solid (increasing disorder).Temperature: Entropy increases with temperature.Number of particles: More particles (especially gas molecules) means higher entropy.Dissolution: Dissolving a solid in water generally increases entropy.Reactions producing more gas molecules: Δ S > 0 \Delta S \gt 0 Δ S > 0 . Reactions consuming gas molecules: Δ S < 0 \Delta S \lt 0 Δ S < 0 . Solid to liquid or liquid to gas transitions: Δ S > 0 \Delta S \gt 0 Δ S > 0 . C a C O 3 ( s ) → C a O ( s ) + C O 2 ( g ) Δ S > 0 ( s o l i d t o s o l i d + g a s ) \mathrm{CaCO}_{3(s)} \to \mathrm{CaO}_{(s)} + \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} \quad \Delta S \gt 0 \mathrm{ (solid to solid + gas)} CaCO 3 ( s ) → CaO ( s ) + CO 2 ( g ) Δ S > 0 ( solidtosolid + gas )
N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 N H 3 ( g ) Δ S < 0 ( 4 m o l g a s t o 2 m o l g a s ) \mathrm{N}_{2(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} \to 2\mathrm{NH}_{3(g)} \quad \Delta S \lt 0 \mathrm{ (4 mol gas to 2 mol gas)} N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 NH 3 ( g ) Δ S < 0 ( 4molgasto2molgas )
Typical values (J mol− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 ):
Substance S ∘ S^\circ S ∘ (J mol− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 )C ( s ) \mathrm{C}_{(s)} C ( s ) 5.7 N a C l ( s ) \mathrm{NaCl}_{(s)} NaCl ( s ) 72.1 H 2 O ( l ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} H 2 O ( l ) 69.9 H 2 O ( g ) \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(g)} H 2 O ( g ) 188.7 C O 2 ( g ) \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} CO 2 ( g ) 213.6 N 2 ( g ) \mathrm{N}_{2(g)} N 2 ( g ) 191.5 N H 3 ( g ) \mathrm{NH}_{3(g)} NH 3 ( g ) 192.3
Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S
Where:
Δ G \Delta G Δ G = Gibbs free energy change (kJ/mol)Δ H \Delta H Δ H = enthalpy change (kJ/mol)T T T = temperature (K)Δ S \Delta S Δ S = entropy change (kJ mol− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 ) Caution
K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 Convert Δ S \Delta S Δ S to kJ mol− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 by dividing by 1000.
Δ G \Delta G Δ G Reaction Δ G < 0 \Delta G \lt 0 Δ G < 0 Feasible (spontaneous) under the given conditions Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 At equilibrium Δ G > 0 \Delta G \gt 0 Δ G > 0 Not feasible (non-spontaneous) under the given conditions
The table below shows when Δ G < 0 \Delta G \lt 0 Δ G < 0 depending on the signs of Δ H \Delta H Δ H and Δ S \Delta S Δ S :
Δ H \Delta H Δ H Δ S \Delta S Δ S Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S Feasibility − - − + + + Always negative Always feasible + + + − - − Always positive Never feasible − - − − - − Negative at low T, positive at high T Feasible at low T only + + + + + + Positive at low T, negative at high T Feasible at high T only
When Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 :
T = Δ H Δ S T = \frac{\Delta H}{\Delta S} T = Δ S Δ H
Worked example 9: For the decomposition of calcium carbonate:
C a C O 3 ( s ) → C a O ( s ) + C O 2 ( g ) \mathrm{CaCO}_{3(s)} \to \mathrm{CaO}_{(s)} + \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} CaCO 3 ( s ) → CaO ( s ) + CO 2 ( g )
Δ H = + 178 k J / m o l \Delta H = +178 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = + 178 kJ/mol , Δ S = + 0.161 k J m o l − 1 K − 1 \Delta S = +0.161 \mathrm{ kJ mol}^{-1} \mathrm{ K}^{-1} Δ S = + 0.161 kJmol − 1 K − 1
Calculate the minimum temperature at which the reaction becomes feasible.
Answer At Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 : T = Δ H Δ S = 178 0.161 = 1106 K = 833 ∘ C T = \dfrac{\Delta H}{\Delta S} = \dfrac{178}{0.161} = 1106 \mathrm{ K} = 833^\circ\mathrm{C} T = Δ S Δ H = 0.161 178 = 1106 K = 83 3 ∘ C
Above 833 ∘ C 833^\circ\mathrm{C} 83 3 ∘ C The reaction becomes thermodynamically feasible.
Worked example 10: For the reaction N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 N H 3 ( g ) \mathrm{N}_{2(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} \to 2\mathrm{NH}_{3(g)} N 2 ( g ) + 3 H 2 ( g ) → 2 NH 3 ( g ) :
Δ H = − 92.0 k J / m o l \Delta H = -92.0 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = − 92.0 kJ/mol , Δ S = − 0.199 k J m o l − 1 K − 1 \Delta S = -0.199 \mathrm{ kJ mol}^{-1} \mathrm{ K}^{-1} Δ S = − 0.199 kJmol − 1 K − 1
Is the reaction feasible at 298 K? At what temperature does it become non-feasible?
Answer At 298 K:
Δ G = − 92.0 − 298 × ( − 0.199 ) = − 92.0 + 59.3 = − 32.7 k J / m o l \Delta G = -92.0 - 298 \times (-0.199) = -92.0 + 59.3 = -32.7 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ G = − 92.0 − 298 × ( − 0.199 ) = − 92.0 + 59.3 = − 32.7 kJ/mol
Since Δ G < 0 \Delta G \lt 0 Δ G < 0 The reaction is feasible at 298 K.
At Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 : T = − 92.0 − 0.199 = 462 K = 189 ∘ C T = \dfrac{-92.0}{-0.199} = 462 \mathrm{ K} = 189^\circ\mathrm{C} T = − 0.199 − 92.0 = 462 K = 18 9 ∘ C
Above 462 K, Δ G > 0 \Delta G \gt 0 Δ G > 0 and the reaction becomes non-feasible. However, in practice the Haber Process operates at high temperature (400—500∘ ^\circ ∘ C) for kinetic reasons (faster rate), and uses A catalyst and continuous removal of N H 3 \mathrm{NH}_3 NH 3 to shift equilibrium.
Energy accounting: Energetics is like balancing a chemical bank account — energy goes in (endothermic) or out (exothermic), and Hess’s Law says the total change is the same regardless of the path taken.
Why it matters: From fuel efficiency to drug design, energy changes determine whether reactions occur and how much energy they release or absorb.
The key insight: Enthalpy change is a state function — it only depends on the starting and ending points, not the route taken, which is why Hess’s Law works.
Sign errors in Hess’s Law: When using Δ H c ∘ \Delta H_c^\circ Δ H c ∘ Remember: Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) \Delta H = \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) - \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{products}) Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( reactants ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( products ) . The signs are reversed compared to using Δ H f ∘ \Delta H_f^\circ Δ H f ∘ .
Forgetting Δ H f ∘ = 0 \Delta H_f^\circ = 0 Δ H f ∘ = 0 for elements: Elements in their standard states have zero enthalpy of formation. Do not skip them or assign them non-zero values.
Bond enthalpy limitations: Bond enthalpies are averages. They do not account for intermolecular forces, phase changes, or the specific molecular environment. Estimates using bond enthalpies differ from experimental values.
Unit inconsistency in Gibbs free energy: Δ H \Delta H Δ H is in kJ/mol, but Δ S \Delta S Δ S is often given in J mol− 1 ^{-1} − 1 K− 1 ^{-1} − 1 . Always convert to the same units.
Calorimetry assumptions: Assuming no heat loss and density = 1.00 g/cm3 ^3 3 introduces systematic errors. Experimental values of Δ H c \Delta H_c Δ H c are always less exothermic than literature values.
Second electron affinity is endothermic: Adding a second electron to a negative ion (O − \mathrm{O}^- O − ) requires energy because of electron-electron repulsion.
Δ G \Delta G Δ G predicts feasibility, not rate: A reaction with Δ G < 0 \Delta G \lt 0 Δ G < 0 may still be extremely slow. Thermodynamic feasibility does not imply kinetic practicality.
Using the following data, calculate Δ H f ∘ \Delta H_f^\circ Δ H f ∘ of C H 3 O H ( l ) \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} CH 3 OH ( l ) :
Δ H c ∘ ( C ( s ) ) = − 393.5 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_{(s)}) = -393.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( C ( s ) ) = − 393.5 kJ/mol Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = − 285.8 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{H}_{2(g)}) = -285.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( H 2 ( g ) ) = − 285.8 kJ/mol Δ H c ∘ ( C H 3 O H ( l ) ) = − 726.0 k J / m o l \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH}_{(l)}) = -726.0 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H c ∘ ( CH 3 OH ( l ) ) = − 726.0 kJ/mol
Answer Formation: C ( s ) + 2 H 2 ( g ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → C H 3 O H ( l ) \mathrm{C}_{(s)} + 2\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} C ( s ) + 2 H 2 ( g ) + 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → CH 3 OH ( l )
Δ H f ∘ = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) \Delta H_f^\circ = \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) - \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{products}) Δ H f ∘ = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( reactants ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( products )
= [ ( − 393.5 ) + 2 ( − 285.8 ) + 0 ] − ( − 726.0 ) = [(-393.5) + 2(-285.8) + 0] - (-726.0) = [( − 393.5 ) + 2 ( − 285.8 ) + 0 ] − ( − 726.0 )
= [ − 393.5 − 571.6 ] + 726.0 = [-393.5 - 571.6] + 726.0 = [ − 393.5 − 571.6 ] + 726.0
= − 965.1 + 726.0 = − 239.1 k J / m o l = -965.1 + 726.0 = -239.1 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} = − 965.1 + 726.0 = − 239.1 kJ/mol
Using bond enthalpies, estimate Δ H \Delta H Δ H for the hydrogenation of ethene:
C 2 H 4 ( g ) + H 2 ( g ) → C 2 H 6 ( g ) \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_{4(g)} + \mathrm{H}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_{6(g)} C 2 H 4 ( g ) + H 2 ( g ) → C 2 H 6 ( g )
Answer Bonds broken:
1 × \times × C=C = 614 4 × \times × C—H = 4 × 413 = 1652 4 \times 413 = 1652 4 × 413 = 1652 1 × \times × H—H = 436 Total bonds broken = 614 + 1652 + 436 = 2702 k J / m o l 614 + 1652 + 436 = 2702 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 614 + 1652 + 436 = 2702 kJ/mol
Bonds formed:
1 × \times × C—C = 347 6 × \times × C—H = 6 × 413 = 2478 6 \times 413 = 2478 6 × 413 = 2478 Total bonds formed = 347 + 2478 = 2825 k J / m o l 347 + 2478 = 2825 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} 347 + 2478 = 2825 kJ/mol
Δ H = 2702 − 2825 = − 123 k J / m o l \Delta H = 2702 - 2825 = -123 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = 2702 − 2825 = − 123 kJ/mol
50.0 cm3 ^3 3 of 0.500 mol/dm3 ^3 3 H N O 3 \mathrm{HNO}_3 HNO 3 is added to 50.0 cm3 ^3 3 of 0.500 mol/dm3 ^3 3 K O H \mathrm{KOH} KOH . The temperature rises from 21.0 ∘ C 21.0^\circ\mathrm{C} 21. 0 ∘ C to 24.2 ∘ C 24.2^\circ\mathrm{C} 24. 2 ∘ C . Calculate the enthalpy of neutralisation per mole of water formed.
Answer Mass of solution = 100.0 g 100.0 \mathrm{ g} 100.0 g
Δ T = 24.2 − 21.0 = 3.2 ∘ C \Delta T = 24.2 - 21.0 = 3.2^\circ\mathrm{C} Δ T = 24.2 − 21.0 = 3. 2 ∘ C
q = 100.0 × 4.18 × 3.2 = 1338 J = 1.338 k J q = 100.0 \times 4.18 \times 3.2 = 1338 \mathrm{ J} = 1.338 \mathrm{ kJ} q = 100.0 × 4.18 × 3.2 = 1338 J = 1.338 kJ
Moles of H 2 O = 0.500 × 50.0 / 1000 = 0.0250 m o l \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} = 0.500 \times 50.0 / 1000 = 0.0250 \mathrm{ mol} H 2 O = 0.500 × 50.0/1000 = 0.0250 mol
Δ H = − 1.338 / 0.0250 = − 53.5 k J / m o l \Delta H = -1.338 / 0.0250 = -53.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = − 1.338/0.0250 = − 53.5 kJ/mol
This is slightly less exothermic than − 57.3 k J / m o l -57.3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 57.3 kJ/mol due to heat losses.
For the reaction C ( s ) + C O 2 ( g ) → 2 C O ( g ) \mathrm{C}_{(s)} + \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} \to 2\mathrm{CO}_{(g)} C ( s ) + CO 2 ( g ) → 2 CO ( g ) :
Δ H = + 173 k J / m o l \Delta H = +173 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = + 173 kJ/mol , Δ S = + 0.176 k J m o l − 1 K − 1 \Delta S = +0.176 \mathrm{ kJ mol}^{-1} \mathrm{ K}^{-1} Δ S = + 0.176 kJmol − 1 K − 1
Calculate Δ G \Delta G Δ G at 298 K and at 1000 K. At what temperature does the reaction become feasible?
Answer At 298 K: Δ G = 173 − 298 × 0.176 = 173 − 52.4 = + 120.6 k J / m o l \Delta G = 173 - 298 \times 0.176 = 173 - 52.4 = +120.6 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ G = 173 − 298 × 0.176 = 173 − 52.4 = + 120.6 kJ/mol
Not feasible at 298 K.
At 1000 K: Δ G = 173 − 1000 × 0.176 = 173 − 176 = − 3 k J / m o l \Delta G = 173 - 1000 \times 0.176 = 173 - 176 = -3 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ G = 173 − 1000 × 0.176 = 173 − 176 = − 3 kJ/mol
Feasible at 1000 K.
At Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 : T = 173 / 0.176 = 983 K = 710 ∘ C T = 173 / 0.176 = 983 \mathrm{ K} = 710^\circ\mathrm{C} T = 173/0.176 = 983 K = 71 0 ∘ C
The reaction becomes feasible above 983 K.
Calculate the lattice energy of N a 2 O \mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{O} Na 2 O given:
Δ H f ∘ ( N a 2 O ) = − 414 k J / m o l \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{O}) = -414 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H f ∘ ( Na 2 O ) = − 414 kJ/mol Δ H a t ∘ ( N a ) = + 108 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ(\mathrm{Na}) = +108 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ ( Na ) = + 108 kJ/mol I E 1 ( N a ) = + 496 k J / m o l \mathrm{IE}_1(\mathrm{Na}) = +496 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} IE 1 ( Na ) = + 496 kJ/mol I E 2 ( N a ) = + 4562 k J / m o l \mathrm{IE}_2(\mathrm{Na}) = +4562 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} IE 2 ( Na ) = + 4562 kJ/mol Δ H a t ∘ ( O ) = + 248 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}^\circ(\mathrm{O}) = +248 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H at ∘ ( O ) = + 248 kJ/mol E A 1 ( O ) = − 141 k J / m o l \mathrm{EA}_1(\mathrm{O}) = -141 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} EA 1 ( O ) = − 141 kJ/mol E A 2 ( O ) = + 798 k J / m o l \mathrm{EA}_2(\mathrm{O}) = +798 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} EA 2 ( O ) = + 798 kJ/mol Answer Born-Haber cycle (for 1 mol N a 2 O \mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{O} Na 2 O So 2 mol Na):
Δ H f ∘ = 2 [ Δ H a t ( N a ) + I E 1 + I E 2 ] + [ Δ H a t ( O ) + E A 1 + E A 2 ] + Δ H l a t t \Delta H_f^\circ = 2[\Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{Na}) + \mathrm{IE}_1 + \mathrm{IE}_2] + [\Delta H_{\mathrm{at}}(\mathrm{O}) + \mathrm{EA}_1 + \mathrm{EA}_2] + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} Δ H f ∘ = 2 [ Δ H at ( Na ) + IE 1 + IE 2 ] + [ Δ H at ( O ) + EA 1 + EA 2 ] + Δ H latt
− 414 = 2 [ 108 + 496 + 4562 ] + [ 248 + ( − 141 ) + 798 ] + Δ H l a t t -414 = 2[108 + 496 + 4562] + [248 + (-141) + 798] + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 414 = 2 [ 108 + 496 + 4562 ] + [ 248 + ( − 141 ) + 798 ] + Δ H latt
− 414 = 2 ( 5166 ) + 905 + Δ H l a t t -414 = 2(5166) + 905 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 414 = 2 ( 5166 ) + 905 + Δ H latt
− 414 = 10332 + 905 + Δ H l a t t -414 = 10332 + 905 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 414 = 10332 + 905 + Δ H latt
− 414 = 11237 + Δ H l a t t -414 = 11237 + \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} − 414 = 11237 + Δ H latt
Δ H l a t t = − 414 − 11237 = − 11651 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} = -414 - 11237 = -11651 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H latt = − 414 − 11237 = − 11651 kJ/mol
Explain why the experimental value of Δ H c \Delta H_c Δ H c for ethanol determined by simple calorimetry (− 656 k J / m o l -656 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 656 kJ/mol ) is significantly less exothermic than the literature value (− 1367 k J / m o l -1367 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} − 1367 kJ/mol ). Suggest two improvements to the experimental setup.
Answer The discrepancy is due to:
Heat loss to surroundings: Much of the heat produced escapes to the air and the calorimeter rather than being absorbed by the water.
Incomplete combustion: Ethanol may burn incompletely, producing CO and soot instead of only C O 2 \mathrm{CO}_2 CO 2 and H 2 O \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} H 2 O Releasing less heat per mole.
Evaporation of ethanol: Some ethanol evaporates before/during combustion, meaning not all the measured mass actually burns.
Improvements:
Use a bomb calorimeter (sealed, insulated vessel) to minimise heat loss and ensure complete combustion.
Reduce the distance between the flame and the calorimeter, or use a draught shield to reduce convective heat loss.
Some enthalpy changes cannot be measured directly and must be determined indirectly using known Values and Hess’s Law.
Worked example 7: Calculate the enthalpy change for:
C ( s ) + 2 H 2 ( g ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → C H 3 O H ( l ) \mathrm{C}_{(s)} + 2\mathrm{H}_{2(g)} + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} C ( s ) + 2 H 2 ( g ) + 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → CH 3 OH ( l )
Using the following data:
C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → C O 2 ( g ) Δ H 1 = − 393.5 k J / m o l \mathrm{C}_{(s)} + \mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} \quad \Delta H_1 = -393.5 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) Δ H 1 = − 393.5 kJ/mol
C H 3 O H ( l ) + 3 2 O 2 ( g ) → C O 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H 2 = − 726.0 k J / m o l \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH}_{(l)} + \frac{3}{2}\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{CO}_{2(g)} + 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} \quad \Delta H_2 = -726.0 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} CH 3 OH ( l ) + 2 3 O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) Δ H 2 = − 726.0 kJ/mol
H 2 ( g ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → H 2 O ( l ) Δ H 3 = − 285.8 k J / m o l \mathrm{H}_{2(g)} + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_{2(g)} \to \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}_{(l)} \quad \Delta H_3 = -285.8 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} H 2 ( g ) + 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → H 2 O ( l ) Δ H 3 = − 285.8 kJ/mol
Answer Route: C + 2 H 2 + 1 2 O 2 → Δ H C H 3 O H \mathrm{C} + 2\mathrm{H}_2 + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_2 \xrightarrow{\Delta H} \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH} C + 2 H 2 + 2 1 O 2 Δ H CH 3 OH
Hess’s Law cycle:
C + 2 H 2 + 1 2 O 2 → Δ H 1 + 2 Δ H 3 C O 2 + 2 H 2 O → − Δ H 2 C H 3 O H \mathrm{C} + 2\mathrm{H}_2 + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_2 \xrightarrow{\Delta H_1 + 2\Delta H_3} \mathrm{CO}_2 + 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \xrightarrow{-\Delta H_2} \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{OH} C + 2 H 2 + 2 1 O 2 Δ H 1 + 2Δ H 3 CO 2 + 2 H 2 O − Δ H 2 CH 3 OH
Δ H = ( Δ H 1 + 2 Δ H 3 ) + ( − Δ H 2 ) \Delta H = (\Delta H_1 + 2\Delta H_3) + (-\Delta H_2) Δ H = ( Δ H 1 + 2Δ H 3 ) + ( − Δ H 2 )
Δ H = ( − 393.5 + 2 ( − 285.8 ) ) − ( − 726.0 ) \Delta H = (-393.5 + 2(-285.8)) - (-726.0) Δ H = ( − 393.5 + 2 ( − 285.8 )) − ( − 726.0 )
Δ H = ( − 393.5 − 571.6 ) + 726.0 \Delta H = (-393.5 - 571.6) + 726.0 Δ H = ( − 393.5 − 571.6 ) + 726.0
Δ H = − 965.1 + 726.0 = − 239.1 k J / m o l \Delta H = -965.1 + 726.0 = -239.1 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = − 965.1 + 726.0 = − 239.1 kJ/mol
The enthalpy of solution is the enthalpy change when 1 mole of solute dissolves in a large excess of Solvent to form an infinitely dilute solution.
N a C l ( s ) → N a ( a q ) + + C l ( a q ) − Δ H s o l ∘ = + 3.9 k J / m o l \mathrm{NaCl}_{(s)} \to \mathrm{Na}^+_{(aq)} + \mathrm{Cl}^-_{(aq)} \quad \Delta H_{\mathrm{sol}}^\circ = +3.9 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} NaCl ( s ) → Na ( a q ) + + Cl ( a q ) − Δ H sol ∘ = + 3.9 kJ/mol
The enthalpy of solution can be related to the lattice energy and the hydration enthalpy:
Δ H s o l = Δ H l a t t + Δ H h y d \Delta H_{\mathrm{sol}} = \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} + \Delta H_{\mathrm{hyd}} Δ H sol = Δ H latt + Δ H hyd
Where Δ H l a t t \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} Δ H latt is the lattice energy (endothermic, breaking the lattice) and Δ H h y d \Delta H_{\mathrm{hyd}} Δ H hyd is the hydration enthalpy (exothermic, ions interacting with water).
For NaCl: Δ H l a t t = + 788 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} = +788 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H latt = + 788 kJ/mol Δ H h y d = − 784 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{hyd}} = -784 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H hyd = − 784 kJ/mol .
Δ H s o l = + 788 + ( − 784 ) = + 4 k J / m o l \Delta H_{\mathrm{sol}} = +788 + (-784) = +4 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H sol = + 788 + ( − 784 ) = + 4 kJ/mol
This is slightly endothermic, consistent with the accepted value of + 3.9 k J / m o l +3.9 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} + 3.9 kJ/mol .
The heat capacity (C C C ) of a substance is the amount of heat required to raise its temperature by 1 K.
C = q Δ T C = \frac{q}{\Delta T} C = Δ T q
For water: C = 4.18 J g − 1 K − 1 C = 4.18 \mathrm{ J g}^{-1} \mathrm{ K}^{-1} C = 4.18 Jg − 1 K − 1 (specific heat capacity, per gram).
In more accurate calorimetry, the heat absorbed by the calorimeter itself must be accounted for:
q t o t a l = ( m w a t e r × c w a t e r + C c a l o r i m e t e r ) × Δ T q_{\mathrm{total}} = (m_{\mathrm{water}} \times c_{\mathrm{water}} + C_{\mathrm{calorimeter}}) \times \Delta T q total = ( m water × c water + C calorimeter ) × Δ T
Worked example 8: A calorimeter has a heat capacity of 50.0 J/K. When 100 cm3 ^3 3 of 1.00 Mol/dm3 ^3 3 HCl is mixed with 100 cm3 ^3 3 of 1.00 mol/dm3 ^3 3 NaOH, the temperature rises from 20.0 ∘ 20.0^\circ 20. 0 ∘ C to 26.7 ∘ 26.7^\circ 26. 7 ∘ C. Calculate Δ H n e u t \Delta H_{\mathrm{neut}} Δ H neut .
Answer Δ T = 26.7 − 20.0 = 6.7 ∘ \Delta T = 26.7 - 20.0 = 6.7^\circ Δ T = 26.7 − 20.0 = 6. 7 ∘ C
q w a t e r = 200 × 4.18 × 6.7 = 5601 J q_{\mathrm{water}} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 6.7 = 5601 \mathrm{ J} q water = 200 × 4.18 × 6.7 = 5601 J
q c a l o r i m e t e r = 50.0 × 6.7 = 335 J q_{\mathrm{calorimeter}} = 50.0 \times 6.7 = 335 \mathrm{ J} q calorimeter = 50.0 × 6.7 = 335 J
q t o t a l = 5601 + 335 = 5936 J = 5.936 k J q_{\mathrm{total}} = 5601 + 335 = 5936 \mathrm{ J} = 5.936 \mathrm{ kJ} q total = 5601 + 335 = 5936 J = 5.936 kJ
Moles of water = 1.00 × 100 / 1000 = 0.100 m o l 1.00 \times 100 / 1000 = 0.100 \mathrm{ mol} 1.00 × 100/1000 = 0.100 mol
Δ H = − 5.936 / 0.100 = − 59.4 k J / m o l \Delta H = -5.936 / 0.100 = -59.4 \mathrm{ kJ/mol} Δ H = − 5.936/0.100 = − 59.4 kJ/mol
A[2_Energetics] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
D --> G[Real-world usage]
Equation Use Δ H = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) \Delta H = \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{products}) - \sum \Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) Δ H = ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( products ) − ∑ Δ H f ∘ ( reactants ) Hess’s Law (formation) Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( r e a c t a n t s ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( p r o d u c t s ) \Delta H = \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{reactants}) - \sum \Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{products}) Δ H = ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( reactants ) − ∑ Δ H c ∘ ( products ) Hess’s Law (combustion) Δ H ≈ ∑ ( b o n d s b r o k e n ) − ∑ ( b o n d s f o r m e d ) \Delta H \approx \sum (\mathrm{bonds broken}) - \sum (\mathrm{bonds formed}) Δ H ≈ ∑ ( bondsbroken ) − ∑ ( bondsformed ) Bond enthalpy estimate q = m c Δ T q = mc\Delta T q = m c Δ T Calorimetry Δ H = − q / n \Delta H = -q/n Δ H = − q / n From calorimetry to molar enthalpy Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S Gibbs free energy T = Δ H / Δ S T = \Delta H / \Delta S T = Δ H /Δ S (when Δ G = 0 \Delta G = 0 Δ G = 0 )Feasibility temperature Δ H s o l = Δ H l a t t + Δ H h y d \Delta H_{\mathrm{sol}} = \Delta H_{\mathrm{latt}} + \Delta H_{\mathrm{hyd}} Δ H sol = Δ H latt + Δ H hyd Solution enthalpy
Use the following data to calculate the enthalpy change for the reaction C ( s ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → CO ( g ) \text{C}(s) + \frac{1}{2}\text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{CO}(g) C ( s ) + 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → CO ( g ) :
C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) \text{C}(s) + \text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2(g) C ( s ) + O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) , Δ H = − 394 kJ mol − 1 \Delta H = -394\,\text{kJ\,mol}^{-1} Δ H = − 394 kJ mol − 1 CO ( g ) + 1 2 O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) \text{CO}(g) + \frac{1}{2}\text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2(g) CO ( g ) + 2 1 O 2 ( g ) → CO 2 ( g ) , Δ H = − 283 kJ mol − 1 \Delta H = -283\,\text{kJ\,mol}^{-1} Δ H = − 283 kJ mol − 1 Solution:
Δ H = ( − 394 ) − ( − 283 ) = − 111 kJ mol − 1 \Delta H = (-394) - (-283) = -111\,\text{kJ\,mol}^{-1} Δ H = ( − 394 ) − ( − 283 ) = − 111 kJ mol − 1
Stashed changes:docs/docs_dse/Chemistry/energetics.md