DSE Chemistry Diagnostic: Energetics / Thermochemistry
Unit Test 1: Hess's Law Cycle Construction
Question
Given the following standard enthalpy changes:
| Reaction | ΔH (kJ/mol) |
|---|
| C(s)+O2(g)→CO2(g) | −393.5 |
| H2(g)+21O2(g)→H2O(l) | −285.8 |
| CH4(g)+2O2(g)→CO2(g)+2H2O(l) | −890.3 |
(a) Using Hess's law, calculate the standard enthalpy of formation of methane, ΔHf∘(CH4). [4 marks]
(b) Draw a Hess's law cycle that clearly shows the two alternative routes from elements to products. [2 marks]
(c) A student writes ΔHf∘(CH4)=−393.5−285.8−(−890.3)=+210.6 kJ/mol. Identify the error in the student's working. [2 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) Target: C(s)+2H2(g)→CH4(g)
Using the cycle: elements → products (via elements → methane → products or directly).
ΔHf∘(CH4)+ΔHc∘(CH4)=ΔHf∘(CO2)+2ΔHf∘(H2O)
ΔHf∘(CH4)+(−890.3)=(−393.5)+2×(−285.8)
ΔHf∘(CH4)−890.3=−393.5−571.6
ΔHf∘(CH4)−890.3=−965.1
ΔHf∘(CH4)=−965.1+890.3=−74.8 kJ/mol
(b) Hess's cycle:
C(s) + 2H2(g) --[ΔHf°(CH4)]--> CH4(g)
| |
| | [ΔHc°(CH4)]
| v
+---[ΔHf°(CO2) + 2ΔHf°(H2O)]--> CO2(g) + 2H2O(l)
Route 1: Elements → Methane → Products: ΔHf∘(CH4)+ΔHc∘(CH4)
Route 2: Elements → Products (directly): ΔHf∘(CO2)+2ΔHf∘(H2O)
(c) The student's arithmetic is correct (−393.5−571.6+890.3=−74.8), but the numerical answer they obtained (+210.6) is wrong because they only subtracted one ΔHf∘(H2O) instead of two. The combustion of methane produces two moles of water, so 2×(−285.8) must be used. The student calculated: −393.5−285.8+890.3=+211.0 (not even their stated answer of 210.6). The correct calculation requires the factor of 2.
Unit Test 2: Average Bond Enthalpy vs Exact
Question
The standard enthalpy change for the reaction H2(g)+Cl2(g)→2HCl(g) is −184.6 kJ/mol.
(a) Using average bond enthalpies (H−H=436 kJ/mol, Cl−Cl=242 kJ/mol, H−Cl=431 kJ/mol), calculate the enthalpy change for this reaction. [3 marks]
(b) Explain why the value obtained in (a) differs from the actual value of −184.6 kJ/mol. [3 marks]
(c) Which type of calculation is more accurate: using average bond enthalpies or using standard enthalpy of formation data? Explain. [2 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) Bonds broken:
H−H:436 kJ/mol
Cl−Cl:242 kJ/mol
Total=436+242=678 kJ/mol
Bonds formed:
2×H−Cl=2×431=862 kJ/mol
ΔH=678−862=−184 kJ/mol
(b) The calculated value (−184) is very close to the actual value (−184.6), but the small difference arises because:
- Average bond enthalpies are averages taken over many different compounds containing that bond type. The actual H−Cl bond enthalpy in HCl(g) may differ slightly from the average value.
- Average bond enthalpies are typically given for species in the gaseous state at 298 K and refer to the mean bond dissociation enthalpy, which may differ from the specific bond enthalpy in this particular reaction.
- The bond enthalpy values have experimental uncertainties.
(c) Using standard enthalpy of formation data is more accurate because these are experimentally measured values specific to each compound, rather than averages. Average bond enthalpies introduce error because the actual bond energy in a specific molecule can deviate from the average due to the molecular environment.
Unit Test 3: Calorimetry with Heat Loss
Question
50.0 cm3 of 1.00 mol/dm3 HCl was mixed with 50.0 cm3 of 1.00 mol/dm3 NaOH in a polystyrene cup. The temperature rose from 20.0∘C to 26.7∘C.
(a) Calculate the enthalpy change of neutralisation per mole of water formed. [4 marks]
(b) The theoretical value is −57.1 kJ/mol. Calculate the percentage error and suggest a reason for any discrepancy. [2 marks]
(c) A student claims that using a glass beaker instead of a polystyrene cup would give a more accurate result. Evaluate this claim. [2 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) Assume density of solution = 1.00 g/cm3 and specific heat capacity = 4.18 J/(g⋅K).
Total volume = 50.0+50.0=100.0 cm3
Mass of solution = 100.0 g
Temperature change = 26.7−20.0=6.7 K
q=mcΔT=100.0×4.18×6.7=2800.6 J=2.80 kJ
Moles of water formed:
n(HCl)=1.00×0.0500=0.0500 mol
n(NaOH)=1.00×0.0500=0.0500 mol
n(H2O)=0.0500 mol (limiting reagent = both, equimolar)
ΔH=n−q=0.0500−2.80=−56.0 kJ/mol
(b) % error=57.1∣−56.0−(−57.1)∣×100%=57.11.1×100%=1.9%
The discrepancy is due to heat loss to the surroundings (the polystyrene cup is not a perfect insulator) and the heat absorbed by the cup itself (which was not accounted for in the calculation).
(c) The claim is incorrect. A glass beaker is a much better conductor of heat than a polystyrene cup, so more heat would be lost to the surroundings. This would result in a smaller temperature rise and a less exothermic (less negative) ΔH value, increasing the error.
Integration Test 1: Hess's Law + Bond Enthalpy Comparison
Question
Given:
- ΔHf∘(C2H4,g)=+52.2 kJ/mol
- ΔHf∘(C2H6,g)=−84.7 kJ/mol
- Bond enthalpies: C=C=612, C−C=348, C−H=412, H−H=436 (all in kJ/mol)
(a) Calculate the enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of ethene using standard enthalpy of formation data:
C2H4(g)+H2(g)→C2H6(g)
[2 marks]
(b) Calculate the same enthalpy change using average bond enthalpies. [4 marks]
(c) Account for any difference between the two values obtained in (a) and (b). [3 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) ΔHrxn=ΔHf∘(C2H6)−ΔHf∘(C2H4)−ΔHf∘(H2)
=−84.7−52.2−0=−136.9 kJ/mol
(b) Bonds broken:
- C=C: 612 kJ/mol
- H−H: 436 kJ/mol
In C2H4 (H2C=CH2): there are 1×C=C and 4×C−H bonds. In
H2: 1×H−H.
Bonds broken: C=C+H−H+4×C−H=612+436+1648=2696 kJ/mol
Bonds formed (in C2H6, H3C−CH3): 1×C−C+6×C−H=348+6×412=348+2472=2820 kJ/mol
ΔH=2696−2820=−124 kJ/mol
(c) The value from formation data (−136.9 kJ/mol) differs from the bond enthalpy value (−124 kJ/mol) by 12.9 kJ/mol.
Reasons:
- Average bond enthalpies are averaged over many different compounds. The actual C−H bond enthalpy in ethane differs from the average C−H bond enthalpy because the electronic environment around each C−H bond varies.
- The C=C bond enthalpy in ethene specifically may differ from the average C=C bond enthalpy.
- The bond enthalpy of H−H in H2 gas is well-defined, but the C−C and C−H values are averages.
Integration Test 2: Born-Haber-Type Cycle
Question
The enthalpy of formation of magnesium oxide is −601.6 kJ/mol.
Given:
- Enthalpy of atomisation of Mg: +147.1 kJ/mol
- First ionisation energy of Mg: +738 kJ/mol
- Second ionisation energy of Mg: +1451 kJ/mol
- Bond dissociation enthalpy of O2: +498 kJ/mol
- First electron affinity of O: −141 kJ/mol
- Second electron affinity of O: +798 kJ/mol
(a) Construct a Born-Haber cycle for the formation of MgO(s) from its elements. [3 marks]
(b) Use the Born-Haber cycle to calculate the lattice enthalpy of MgO(s). [3 marks]
(c) Explain why the second electron affinity of oxygen is endothermic. [2 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) Born-Haber cycle:
Mg(s) + 1/2 O2(g) --[ΔHf°]--> MgO(s)
| |
| +147.1 | [ΔHlattice]
v v
Mg(g) + 1/2 O2(g) Mg2+(g) + O2-(g)
| ^
| +738, +1451 |
v | -141, +798
Mg2+(g) + 1/2 O2(g) |
| |
| +249 (1/2 x 498) |
v |
Mg2+(g) + O(g) ---------------------+
(b) Hess's law:
ΔHf∘=ΔHatom(Mg)+IE1+IE2+21ΔHdiss(O2)+EA1+EA2+ΔHlattice
−601.6=147.1+738+1451+249+(−141)+798+ΔHlattice
−601.6=147.1+738+1451+249−141+798+ΔHlattice
Sum of all terms except lattice: 147.1+738+1451+249−141+798=3242.1
−601.6=3242.1+ΔHlattice
ΔHlattice=−601.6−3242.1=−3843.7 kJ/mol
(c) The second electron affinity of oxygen is endothermic because the O− ion already carries a negative charge. Adding a second electron to O− requires overcoming electrostatic repulsion between the incoming electron and the existing negative charge. Energy must be supplied to force the second electron onto the negatively charged ion.
Integration Test 3: Multi-Step Energetics
Question
Methanol (CH3OH) can be used as a fuel. The complete combustion of methanol is:
2CH3OH(l)+3O2(g)→2CO2(g)+4H2O(l)ΔH=−1452 kJ/mol (for the equation as written)
The standard enthalpy of formation of CO2(g) is −393.5 kJ/mol and of H2O(l) is −285.8 kJ/mol.
(a) Calculate the standard enthalpy of formation of methanol, CH3OH(l). [3 marks]
(b) Calculate the enthalpy change when 10.0 g of methanol is burned completely. [2 marks]
(c) When 10.0 g of methanol was burned to heat 500 g of water, the temperature of the water rose by 31.2∘C. Calculate the experimental enthalpy of combustion per mole of methanol and the percentage efficiency of the experiment. [4 marks]
Worked Solution
(a) For 2 mol of methanol:
ΔHrxn=2ΔHf∘(CO2)+4ΔHf∘(H2O)−2ΔHf∘(CH3OH)−3ΔHf∘(O2)
−1452=2(−393.5)+4(−285.8)−2ΔHf∘(CH3OH)−0
−1452=−787.0−1143.2−2ΔHf∘(CH3OH)
−1452=−1930.2−2ΔHf∘(CH3OH)
2ΔHf∘(CH3OH)=−1930.2+1452=−478.2
ΔHf∘(CH3OH)=−239.1 kJ/mol
(b) M(CH3OH)=12.0+4×1.0+16.0+1.0=32.0 g/mol
n(CH3OH)=32.010.0=0.3125 mol
Enthalpy change per mole = 2−1452=−726 kJ/mol
ΔH=0.3125×(−726)=−226.9 kJ
(c) Heat absorbed by water:
q=mcΔT=500×4.18×31.2=65208 J=65.2 kJ
Experimental enthalpy of combustion per mole:
ΔHexp=0.3125−65.2=−208.6 kJ/mol
Percentage efficiency:
% efficiency=726208.6×100%=28.7%
This low efficiency is due to significant heat loss to the surroundings, incomplete combustion, and heat absorbed by the container.